Sunday, September 19, 2010

Milena Velba Free Picyure

BIW for additional noise at the Laugna junction

(Wertingen 19/09/2010) At the board meeting the Citizens' Initiative for Wertingen and city areas "was discussed the issue of bridge construction at the intersection Laugna again. All members present were in agreement in support of city and county council Peter Seefried, who had spoken out for construction. Seefried was however noted that the issue of noise had to be reworked yet again. So Peter Seefried is of the opinion that the 250,000 € savings should be the bridge to the roundabout pure invests at least partially in an additional noise protection. Such as the closing argument of the opponents bridge was lifted. Astonished, the BIW-City Council was by the sudden Sparfreudigkeit his Council colleagues Klingler and Zenetti. So these have over the entire period of time supported any increase in the city for the citizens. Only Seefried myself have voted consistently against the other citizens of stress. What did he then brought criticism from Zenetti and Klingler.
BIW-Mayer Managing Director interjected that there were also the disproportionate promotion of the music or the loan liability of the city for the Islamic Association not to blame for the two left town councils. "It almost has the impression that this" Left Front Saver always like, if something is being done for the masses. I think that pseudo-saving behavior of men and Klingler Zenetti for not credible. When it came to other civil charges, both have always voted for the increases, "said Peter Seefried. Sven Rosenberg expressed his concern that - should a public petition to reject the bridge - the city Wertingen then stand there is no alternative. Rosenberg says, "We have nothing, and in a few years, the city may then pay out of pocket a traffic improvement. Then begin the great wailing and no one wants to have been. "Hubert Mayer does not see a referendum on the principle of negative, but this represents the sentiments of the grassroots BIW. "It's remarkable that we - rightly - should decide a bridge, but this only has a regional aspect. But when it comes to major decisions, such as may in the removal of the DM or the billions in aid to Greece, the citizens decide nothing. Here he had also never heard from the ominous environment of the bridge opponents. "Then let the men and in those topics, it is about higher billions and not a few million euros," said Mayer of himself. Finally, Sven Rosenberg spoke again. He again criticized the tax extravagance argument of the bridge opponents. It could still not be that the good Wertinger citizens pay their taxes like every year and if something comes to the less developed district of Dillingen in Munich, then this will be sabotaged from within the company. Rosenberg added: "Those who believe that to do with his negative attitude of something good for our region, more wrong. In fact, if this bridge is not built, the money is invested elsewhere, and at worst in the country. The county has another location disadvantage. This creates no new jobs, yet this ensures the future of our children. "

0 comments:

Post a Comment